Seattle Central Community Racial Discrimination in Educational Institutions Essay

Seattle Central Community Racial Discrimination in Educational Institutions Essay

Seattle Central Community Racial Discrimination in Educational Institutions Essay


Question Description

I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.

The Social Issue Paper will be a thorough review of research about a social issue of interest to you and relevant to the field of Community Psychology. Some example topics to focus on are: substance abuse and addiction and criminal/juvenile justice. You can write about either one or both.

Feel free to pose other topics of interest to you. In addition to reviewing research about a topic of interest, this paper will include a critique of some of the research in psychology related to the issue you are focusing on, drawing from the conceptual and methodological components of Community Psychology, as described in your readings and the class. If you are interested in this option, you should be exploring research about an issue of interest to you throughout the quarter.

I will ask everyone to let me know what issue they will be examining by Monday, November 2


Paper should be approximately 10 double-spaced pages, including a title page and references. References and in-text citations should be in APA format, all other components should look nice but do not need to be in APA format. Papers should also include each of these


1) Begin your paper with a succinct statement about the problem, including a clear description of the problem and its scope (i.e., describe who is affected by it, including which individuals and communities, and



o Here you should draw from at least one of the assigned class articles as you define the problem and at least one additional academic resource (including legitimate websites, such as the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Health, etc.). (1-2 pages)

2) Next present a review of the research that has been conducted to address this problem, drawing from the ecological perspective that is at the heart of Community Psychology. Specifically, describe the research that has been conducted to address this problem at the individual, community, and/or societal levels. If much of the research focuses on individual-level outcomes, at the very least, include a description of the community, and social factors that


“drive” the problem and/or that get in the way of resolving the problem. (2-4 pages). Seattle Central Community Racial Discrimination in Educational Institutions Essay

o Here you should be referencing the bulk of the research you reviewed; at least four empirical articles from peer-reviewed journals. Empirical means data was collected and analyzed. Data could be in the form of surveys, interviews, observations, etc., but some form of data should have been collected and analyzed.

  1. 3) Next present a critique of the research you reviewed drawing from some of the conceptual and methodological components of Community Psychology. In other words, imagine how


    of the studies you reviewed could have been improved if some of the tenets of community psychology (e.g., values, principles, research methods.) were incorporated, either at the level of defining the problem, designing the study, and/or making use of the results. Aim to point out limitations of two studies, but you can also talk across your studies if you identified a common limitation. (1-2 pages) *** NOTE- this section can also be weaved into section two.
  2. 4) The last section of the paper should focus on



    innovative solutions

    to the problem. Some of these solutions may be referenced in the articles you reviewed. If so, cite those articles accordingly. However, you are also encouraged “to think outside the box” and add to descriptions of potential solutions presented in the articles you reviewed based on what you have learned in class. (2-3 pages).

Below I have attached one of the class aritcle that you can use in the paper

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.


Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.


Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.