New York Film Academy Evil Versus the Theistic View of the World Essay

New York Film Academy Evil Versus the Theistic View of the World Essay

New York Film Academy Evil Versus the Theistic View of the World Essay


Question Description

I’m working on a science discussion question and need an explanation to help me learn.


7 pages / 1925 words


English (US)


1. on the 3 questions for you to choose one from: The final essay with unweighted 10 credit points (to be graded in the 2nd group) is the platform where you get to exercise your logical acumen and thinking abilities at the end of the course. That is the ultimate purpose for the study of “informal” logic, where there has to be a common substantive philosophical inquiry. As might have been suggested along the way, given what we have treated ourselves with Edutainment, it is concerned with the extent to which a logical thinking can be applied to one of the most vexing questions of human existence. The object of subject matter in logic is “argument” defined as a body of thoughts to be expressed in a structure, where the conclusion is a function of the premises with the inference in the middle. Our formal exercises with proof is a rigorous procedure to ascertain only validity as a part of soundness; now you shall get a chance to be thinking about argumentation with the whole ideal properties by writing an essay on a substantive question that you get to choose within an area. Thus this final essay requirement can be met by submitting a “substantive term paper” on one of the 3 questions posed below. The Question 1 below is directly related to the theme of the Edutainment; but there are also for two more questions as alternatives; all in all, you have 3 questions to choose from. Reading materials (5 pieces, from A to E) are attached to this email; they are selected for readability and manageability; but you don’t have to confine yourself to them, as you may look into any other materials deemed as relevant. Here are the three questions: ——————————


— Question 1: Is the so-call “Problem of Evil” strong enough to dismantle the theistic view of the world? Is any of “theodicies” convincing enough to uphold it? Reading A…St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, Q.2, esp., 3rd Article, Obj. 1 (p.5) & Reply (p.7) Reading B…Zagzebski, “The Problem of Evil”

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.


Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.


Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.